2019年10月31日星期四

2019.10.30网络政治犯周报(总第13期,2019年10月24日至10月30日)




资料
一、     新悉网政治犯

2.       2019.10.24得悉:山东平邑县孟某因批评政府被行拘10 https://twitter.com/watchwci/status/1187429094176317442 https://3w.huanqiu.com/a/188f3f/7KEBUBM1Mqs
3.       2019.10.24得悉:海南保亭李某昌因批评警察被行拘7https://new.qq.com/omn/20190612/20190612A0EVQT.html
4.       2019.10.25得悉:保定李某在LED显示屏显示反华标语被刑拘 https://twitter.com/SpeechFreedomCN/status/1187914846685106176
5.       2019.10.25得悉: 民间监督网创始人李新德和儿子李超被捕https://www.rfa.org/cantonese/news/wang-10252019060107.html

二、     在押网政治犯情况

1.  2019.10.24陕西龙克海被控寻衅滋事案将于1030日开庭https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/20191030.html
2.  2019.10.25 广州梁颂基张五洲被判寻衅滋事罪https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/renquanfazhi/gf2-10252019090303.html
3.  2019.10.28张宝成获律师会见 https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/blog-post_63.html
4.  2019.10.28 湖北陈剑雄、袁兵寻衅滋事案二审维持原判 https://www.msguancha.com/a/lanmu13/2019/1028/19075.html
5.  2019.10.29江苏王默被审查起诉,家属被迫解除新任辩护律师委 https://msguancha.com/a/lanmu13/2019/1028/19078.html
6.  2019.10.30 大连王承刚、王大鹏因推特言论被判寻衅滋事罪,分别获刑16个月和12https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/1612.html


三、     外网政治犯情况

1.  2019.10.26 山东孙峰服满煽颠罪5年刑期已于本月出狱https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/520191011.html https://twitter.com/watchwci/status/1188128241506291713


四、     外界关注




2019年10月26日星期六

2019.10.21伪最高法院和检察院关于办理非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释

 《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》已于2019年6月3日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1771次会议、2019年9月4日由最高人民检察院第十三届检察委员会第二十三次会议通过,现予公布,自2019年11月1日起施行。

  最高人民法院   最高人民检察院


  2019年10月21日


法释〔2019〕15号
最高人民法院最高人民检察院
关于办理非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释
(2019年6月3日最高人民法院审判委员会第1771次会议、
2019年9月4日最高人民检察院第十三届检察委员会
第二十三次会议通过,自2019年11月1日起施行)
为依法惩治拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务、非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动等犯罪,维护正常网络秩序,根据《中华人民共和国刑法》《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》的规定,现就办理此类刑事案件适用法律的若干问题解释如下:
  第一条 提供下列服务的单位和个人,应当认定为刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款规定的“网络服务提供者”:
  (一)网络接入、域名注册解析等信息网络接入、计算、存储、传输服务;
  (二)信息发布、搜索引擎、即时通讯、网络支付、网络预约、网络购物、网络游戏、网络直播、网站建设、安全防护、广告推广、应用商店等信息网络应用服务;
  (三)利用信息网络提供的电子政务、通信、能源、交通、水利、金融、教育、医疗等公共服务。
  第二条 刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款规定的“监管部门责令采取改正措施”,是指网信、电信、公安等依照法律、行政法规的规定承担信息网络安全监管职责的部门,以责令整改通知书或者其他文书形式,责令网络服务提供者采取改正措施。
  认定“经监管部门责令采取改正措施而拒不改正”,应当综合考虑监管部门责令改正是否具有法律、行政法规依据,改正措施及期限要求是否明确、合理,网络服务提供者是否具有按照要求采取改正措施的能力等因素进行判断。
  第三条 拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款第一项规定的“致使违法信息大量传播”:
  (一)致使传播违法视频文件二百个以上的;
  (二)致使传播违法视频文件以外的其他违法信息二千个以上的;
  (三)致使传播违法信息,数量虽未达到第一项、第二项规定标准,但是按相应比例折算合计达到有关数量标准的;
  (四)致使向二千个以上用户账号传播违法信息的;
  (五)致使利用群组成员账号数累计三千以上的通讯群组或者关注人员账号数累计三万以上的社交网络传播违法信息的;
  (六)致使违法信息实际被点击数达到五万以上的;
  (七)其他致使违法信息大量传播的情形。
  第四条 拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务,致使用户信息泄露,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款第二项规定的“造成严重后果”:
  (一)致使泄露行踪轨迹信息、通信内容、征信信息、财产信息五百条以上的;
  (二)致使泄露住宿信息、通信记录、健康生理信息、交易信息等其他可能影响人身、财产安全的用户信息五千条以上的;
  (三)致使泄露第一项、第二项规定以外的用户信息五万条以上的;
  (四)数量虽未达到第一项至第三项规定标准,但是按相应比例折算合计达到有关数量标准的;
  (五)造成他人死亡、重伤、精神失常或者被绑架等严重后果的;
  (六)造成重大经济损失的;
  (七)严重扰乱社会秩序的;
  (八)造成其他严重后果的。
  第五条 拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务,致使影响定罪量刑的刑事案件证据灭失,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款第三项规定的“情节严重”:
  (一)造成危害国家安全犯罪、恐怖活动犯罪、黑社会性质组织犯罪、贪污贿赂犯罪案件的证据灭失的;
  (二)造成可能判处五年有期徒刑以上刑罚犯罪案件的证据灭失的;
  (三)多次造成刑事案件证据灭失的;
  (四)致使刑事诉讼程序受到严重影响的;
  (五)其他情节严重的情形。
  第六条 拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十六条之一第一款第四项规定的“有其他严重情节”:
  (一)对绝大多数用户日志未留存或者未落实真实身份信息认证义务的;
  (二)二年内经多次责令改正拒不改正的;
  (三)致使信息网络服务被主要用于违法犯罪的;
  (四)致使信息网络服务、网络设施被用于实施网络攻击,严重影响生产、生活的;
  (五)致使信息网络服务被用于实施危害国家安全犯罪、恐怖活动犯罪、黑社会性质组织犯罪、贪污贿赂犯罪或者其他重大犯罪的;
  (六)致使国家机关或者通信、能源、交通、水利、金融、教育、医疗等领域提供公共服务的信息网络受到破坏,严重影响生产、生活的;
  (七)其他严重违反信息网络安全管理义务的情形。
  第七条 刑法第二百八十七条之一规定的“违法犯罪”,包括犯罪行为和属于刑法分则规定的行为类型但尚未构成犯罪的违法行为。
  第八条 以实施违法犯罪活动为目的而设立或者设立后主要用于实施违法犯罪活动的网站、通讯群组,应当认定为刑法第二百八十七条之一第一款第一项规定的“用于实施诈骗、传授犯罪方法、制作或者销售违禁物品、管制物品等违法犯罪活动的网站、通讯群组”。
  第九条 利用信息网络提供信息的链接、截屏、二维码、访问账号密码及其他指引访问服务的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十七条之一第一款第二项、第三项规定的“发布信息”。
  第十条 非法利用信息网络,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十七条之一第一款规定的“情节严重”:
  (一)假冒国家机关、金融机构名义,设立用于实施违法犯罪活动的网站的;
  (二)设立用于实施违法犯罪活动的网站,数量达到三个以上或者注册账号数累计达到二千以上的;
  (三)设立用于实施违法犯罪活动的通讯群组,数量达到五个以上或者群组成员账号数累计达到一千以上的;
  (四)发布有关违法犯罪的信息或者为实施违法犯罪活动发布信息,具有下列情形之一的:
  1.在网站上发布有关信息一百条以上的;
  2.向二千个以上用户账号发送有关信息的;
  3.向群组成员数累计达到三千以上的通讯群组发送有关信息的;
  4.利用关注人员账号数累计达到三万以上的社交网络传播有关信息的;
  (五)违法所得一万元以上的;
  (六)二年内曾因非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动、危害计算机信息系统安全受过行政处罚,又非法利用信息网络的;
  (七)其他情节严重的情形。
  第十一条 为他人实施犯罪提供技术支持或者帮助,具有下列情形之一的,可以认定行为人明知他人利用信息网络实施犯罪,但是有相反证据的除外:
  (一)经监管部门告知后仍然实施有关行为的;
  (二)接到举报后不履行法定管理职责的;
  (三)交易价格或者方式明显异常的;
  (四)提供专门用于违法犯罪的程序、工具或者其他技术支持、帮助的;
  (五)频繁采用隐蔽上网、加密通信、销毁数据等措施或者使用虚假身份,逃避监管或者规避调查的;
  (六)为他人逃避监管或者规避调查提供技术支持、帮助的;
  (七)其他足以认定行为人明知的情形。
  第十二条 明知他人利用信息网络实施犯罪,为其犯罪提供帮助,具有下列情形之一的,应当认定为刑法第二百八十七条之二第一款规定的“情节严重”:
  (一)为三个以上对象提供帮助的;
  (二)支付结算金额二十万元以上的;
  (三)以投放广告等方式提供资金五万元以上的;
  (四)违法所得一万元以上的;
  (五)二年内曾因非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动、危害计算机信息系统安全受过行政处罚,又帮助信息网络犯罪活动的;
  (六)被帮助对象实施的犯罪造成严重后果的;
  (七)其他情节严重的情形。
  实施前款规定的行为,确因客观条件限制无法查证被帮助对象是否达到犯罪的程度,但相关数额总计达到前款第二项至第四项规定标准五倍以上,或者造成特别严重后果的,应当以帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪追究行为人的刑事责任。
  第十三条 被帮助对象实施的犯罪行为可以确认,但尚未到案、尚未依法裁判或者因未达到刑事责任年龄等原因依法未予追究刑事责任的,不影响帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的认定。
  第十四条 单位实施本解释规定的犯罪的,依照本解释规定的相应自然人犯罪的定罪量刑标准,对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员定罪处罚,并对单位判处罚金。
  第十五条 综合考虑社会危害程度、认罪悔罪态度等情节,认为犯罪情节轻微的,可以不起诉或者免予刑事处罚;情节显著轻微危害不大的,不以犯罪论处。
  第十六条 多次拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务、非法利用信息网络、帮助信息网络犯罪活动构成犯罪,依法应当追诉的,或者二年内多次实施前述行为未经处理的,数量或者数额累计计算。
  第十七条 对于实施本解释规定的犯罪被判处刑罚的,可以根据犯罪情况和预防再犯罪的需要,依法宣告职业禁止;被判处管制、宣告缓刑的,可以根据犯罪情况,依法宣告禁止令。
  第十八条 对于实施本解释规定的犯罪的,应当综合考虑犯罪的危害程度、违法所得数额以及被告人的前科情况、认罪悔罪态度等,依法判处罚金。
  第十九条 本解释自2019年11月1日起施行。
 So as to lawfully punish crimes such as refusals to perform information network security management obligations, illegal use of information networks, and aiding criminal activities on information networks; and to preserve normal network order; on the basis of the "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" and the" Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China"; the following Interpretation on handling such cases is hereby made:
Article 1: Units and individuals providing the following services shall be found to be "network service providers" as provided for in paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 286-1:
(1) Network access, DNS resolution, and other information network access, computing, storage, or transmission services;
(2) Information publishing, search engines, instant messaging, online payment, online booking, online sales, online games, online live-streaming, website construction, security protection, advertisement promotions, app stores, and other information networks application services;
(3) Use of information networks to provide public services such as e-governance, communications, power, transportation, water, finance, education, and medical care.
Article 2: “Regulatory departments order the adoption of corrective measures" , as provided for in paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 286-1, refers to internet information, telecommunications, public security, and other such departments that undertake information network security oversight duties in accordance with laws and administrative regulations, use of a written corrective order or other document to order network service providers to adopt corrective measures.
Findings of a "refusal to make corrections upon being ordered by regulatory departments to employ corrective measures, shall be upon a decision based on comprehensive consideration of whether the regulatory departments' corrective order has a basis in laws or administrative regulations, whether the corrective measures and time period are clear and reasonable, whether the network service providers have the capacity to adopt corrective measures as required, and other such factors.
Article 3: In any of the following circumstances, refusals to perform information network security management obligations shall be found to be "causing transmission of large volumes of unlawful information" as provided for in item 1 of paragraph 1 of article 286-1 of the Criminal Law:
(1) Causing transmission of 200 or more illegal video documents;
(2) Causing transmission of 2,000 or more non-video documents with illegal information;
(3) Causing transmission of illegal information where the amounts do not reach the standards provided in items (1) and (2), but if taken together converting by the relevant ratios, the relevant quantity standards are met.
(4) Causing transmission of illegal information to 2,000 or more user accounts;
(5) Causing the use of chat groups with group members totaling 3,000 or more, or social networks with 30,000 or more followers, to transmit illegal information;
(6) Causing illegal information to be actually clicked 50,000 or more times;
(7) Other circumstances causing mass transmission of illegal information.
Article 4: In any of the following circumstances, refusals to perform information network security management obligations causing leaks of user information shall be found to be "causing serious consequences" as provided for in item (2) of paragraph 1 of article 286-1 of the Criminal Law:
(1) Causing the leak of 500 or more items of tracking information, communications information, credit reporting information, or asset information;
(2) Causing the leak of 5,000 or more items of housing information, communications records, physical health information, transaction information, and other such user information that might impact security in one's person or property;
(3) Causing the leak of 50,000 or more items of user information other than that provided for in (1) and (2);
(4) Where the amounts do not reach the standards provided in items 1-3, but if taken together converting by the relevant ratios, the relevant quantity standards are met.
(5) Caused serious consequences to others such as death, serious injury, psychiatric abnormalities, or being kidnapped;
(6) Caused major economic losses;
(7) Seriously disrupted social order;
(8) Caused other serious consequences.
Article 5: In any of the following circumstances, refusals to perform information network security management obligations causing destruction of evidence in criminal cases that impacts conviction or sentencing shall be found to be "serious circumstances" as provided for in item (3) of paragraph 1 of artel 286-1 of the Criminal Law:
(1) Causing destruction of evidence in cases of crimes endangering national security, terrorist activity crimes, underworld criminal organization crimes and embezzlement and bribery;
(2) Causing destruction of evidence in cases of crimes that might have a sentence of 5 years imprisonment or higher;
(3) Causing destruction of evidence in criminal cases several times;
(4) Causing serious impact to criminal proceedings;
(5) Other situations where the circumstances are serious.
Article 6: In any of the following circumstances, refusals to perform information network security management obligations shall be found to be "having other serious circumstances" as provided for in item (4) of paragraph 1 of article 286-1 of the Criminal Law:
(1) Not keeping logs or implementing identity verification obligations for the vast majority of users;
(2) Refusing to make changes upon being ordered to do so multiple times within 2 years;
(3) Causing information network services to be primarily used for violations and crimes;
(4) Causing information network services or network facilities to be used to carry out network attacks, seriously impacting production and livelihoods;
(5) Causing information network services to be used to carry out crimes endangering national security, terrorist activity crimes, underworld criminal organization crimes, embezzlement and bribery, of other major crimes;
(6) Causing damage to state organs' information networks or those provide public services in fields such as communications, power, transportation, water, finance, education, and medical care; seriously impacting production and livelihoods;
(7) Other situations of serious violations of information network security management obligations.
Article 7: "Violations and crimes", as provided for in Criminal Law article 287-1, includes criminal conduct and illegal conduct that is of the type provided for in the Specific Provisions of the Criminal Law, but that has not yet constituted a crime.
Article 8: Websites and chat groups established primarily for the purpose of carrying out illegal activities or that are used primarily for illegal activities after being established, shall be found to be "websites and chat groups used for illegal and criminal activities such as fraud, transmitted criminal methods, and producing or selling prohibited or controlled items", as provided for in item (1) of paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 287-1.
Article 9: Use of information networks to provide links, screen shots, QR codes, visitor account passwords, and other services to draw in visitors to information, shall be found to be "publishing information" as provided for in items (2) and (3) of paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 287-1.
Article 10: In any of the following circumstances, illegal use of information networks shall be found to be 'serious circumstances' as provided for in paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 287-1:
(1) Impersonating a state organ or financial institutions to establish a website used to carry out illegal or criminal activities;
(2) Establishing websites used to carry out illegal or criminal activities, numbering 3 or more, or with a cumulative number of registered users reaching 2,000 or more;
(3) Establishing chat groups used to carry out illegal or criminal activities, numbering 5 or more, or with a cumulative number of member accounts totaling 1,000 or more;
(4) Publishing information related to violations or crimes, or publishing information for the perpetration of violations or crimes, in any one of the following circumstances:
1. Publishing relevant 100 or more items of related information on the website;
2. Transmitting illegal information to 2,000 or more user accounts;
3. Sending relevant information to groups with a total number of 3,000 or more members;
4. Using social networks to transmit relevant information to 30,00 or more total followers;
(5) Where unlawful gains are 10,000 RMB or more;
(6) Where, having received administrative punishments for illegally using information networks, assisting in criminal information network activities, or endangering computer information system security within the preceding two years, one again illegally uses information networks;
(7) Other situations where the circumstances are serious.
Article 11: Where providing technical support or assistance to the commission of crimes in any one of the following circumstances, the actor may be found to clearly know that others are using information networks to perpetrate crimes, except where the is relevant refuting evidence:
(1) After being informed by regulatory departments, they continue to carry out the relevant conduct;
(2) After receiving a report, the do not perform their legally-prescribed management duties;
(3) Transaction prices or methods are clearly irregular;
(4) Provided programs, tools, or other technical support and assistance that is specially used in violations or crimes;
(5) Frequently used measures such as hidden internet access, encrypted communications, or destruction of data, or used fake identities, to avoid regulation or elude investigation;
(6) Provided technical support or assistance to others for avoiding regulation or eluding investigation;
(7) Other situations sufficient to determine knowledge of the actor.
Article 12: In any one of the following circumstances, where one knows that in any one of the following circumstances are being used to commit crimes, providing assistance to the crime shall be found to be 'serious circumstances' as provided for in paragraph 1 of Criminal Law article 287-2:
(1) Provided assistance to 3 or more targets;
(2) Payment or settlement amounts were 200,000 RMB or more;
(3) Providing capital of 50,000 RMB or more through advertisements or other such means;
(4) Where unlawful gains are 10,000 RMB or more;
(5) Where, having received administrative punishments for illegally using information networks, assisting in criminal information network activities, or endangering computer information system security within the preceding two years, one again assists criminal information network activities;
(6) Where the crime that the recipient of the assistance carried out causes serious consequences;
(7) Other situations where the circumstances are serious.
In carrying out the activity provided for in the preceding paragraph, where due to objective capacity limitations there was to confirm whether recipient of assistance had reached the level of a crime, but the total numbers reached five times the standards provided for in items (2)-(4) of the preceding paragraph, or especially serious consequences were caused, criminal responsibility shall be pursued for the crime of assisting information networks criminal activities.
Article 13: Where the criminal conduct of the recipient of assistance can be confirmed, but there is no way to pursue criminal responsibility for reasons such as their not yet having been brought in, not yet been lawfully adjudged, or not yet achieved the age of criminal responsibility; it does not impact the finding of assistance in criminal information networks activities.
Article 14: Where a unit commits crimes provided for in this Interpretation, the directly responsible managers and other directly responsible personnel shall be tried and punished according to the provisions of this interpretation regarding the standards for conviction and punishment of crimes by natural persons, and the unit is to be fined.
Article 15: Where on comprehensive consideration of the degree of social danger, repentant attitude, and other such circumstances, it is found that the circumstances of the crime are slight, it may be decided to not prosecute or to waive criminal penalties; where the circumstances are clearly slight and the harm is not large, it is not to be handled criminally.
Article 16: Where there are several instances of refusal to perform information network security management obligations, illegal use of information networks, or assistance in criminal information networks activities that constitute crimes and shall be lawfully pursued; or where within two years there are several instances of carrying out the conduct described above that has not been addressed; the volumes or amounts are calculated cumulatively.
Article 17: Where commission of the crimes provided for in this Interpretation have been given criminal punishments, professional prohibitions may be announced in accordance with law based on the circumstances of the crime and the need to prevent further crime; where the sentence was controlled release or a suspended sentence, based on the circumstances of the crime, an injunction may lawfully announced.
Article 18: Where crimes provided for in this Interpretation are committed, fines shall be lawfully imposed based on comprehensive consideration of the degree of harm, the amount of unlawful gains, and the defendants' criminal record and attitude of repentance and remorse, and so forth.
Article 19: This Interpretation takes effect on November 1, 2019.
 
转自:http://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-193711.html;https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/%E5%85%B3%E4%BA%8E%E5%8A%9E%E7%90%86%E9%9D%9E%E6%B3%95%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C%E3%80%81%E5%B8%AE%E5%8A%A9%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C%E7%8A%AF%E7%BD%AA%E6%B4%BB/

2019年10月24日星期四

2019.10.23网络政治犯周报(总第12期,2019年10月17日至10月23日)




资料
一、     新悉网政治犯

1.  2019.10.17得悉:官微“子洲交警”管理员苗乐因发布涉及土改言论被以玩忽职守罪判刑https://twitter.com/watchwci/status/1184868659522686976
2.  2019.10.18得悉:浙江林辉因发表涉港言论被行拘15https://twitter.com/watchwci/status/1185435262421213184
3.  2019.10.17得悉:四川程爱华被刑拘1个月后取保 https://twitter.com/heibazahei/status/1184867779905765376
5.  2019.10.22得悉:通辽出租车司机黄某因在微信发动罢工被行拘https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1644012903661301259 https://twitter.com/watchwci/status/1186657472381095936
6.  2019.10.22得悉:湖南益阳70岁老人冷某春因在微信反共被行拘12https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/qV8mQNV2T5ZP75pCoKDCxw
7.  2019.10.23得悉: 上海网友张展失联超四十天                https://cmcn.org/archives/43258

二、     在押网政治犯情况

1.  2019.10.17周勇军在广西被以寻衅滋事罪判刑12个月,即将获释https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/12.html
2.  2019.10.17苏州戈觉平第三次超审限羁押健康堪https://www.msguancha.com/a/lanmu13/2019/1017/19038.html
3.  2019.10.18湖南朱承志在苏州受审,审限到期未宣判https://www.chinaaid.net/2019/10/blog-post_18.html
4.  2019.10.18李文足到监狱探视丈夫王全璋,王健康堪忧https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/renquanfazhi/al-10182019081425.html
5.  2019.10.21 广州梁颂基、张五洲案开庭后退侦期满,即将宣https://www.msguancha.com/a/lanmu13/2019/1021/19052.html
6.  2019.10.22 广西陈家鸿被羁押半年后,律师首次获准会见 https://www.chinaaid.net/2019/10/blog-post_23.html
7.  2019.10.23云南徐昆因网络言论被批准逮捕https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/renquanfazhi/ql1-10232019081145.html
8.  2019.10.23安徽沈良庆案上月已移交检察院审查起诉 https://www.chinaaid.net/2019/10/9.html


三、     外网政治犯情况

1.  2019.10.19 四川陈云飞被刑拘1个月后取保获释 https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2019/10/blog-post_28.html
2.  2019.10.19 广州赖日福刑拘31天获取https://www.msguancha.com/a/lanmu13/2019/1019/19043.html
3.  2019.10.21 周勇军刑满释放,自由仍受限制 
4.  2019.10.22佩利(程爱华)被捕及获释情况 https://www.msguancha.com/a/lanmu1/2019/1022/19056.html

四、     外界关注


1.       2019.10.21 国际人权组织联合呼吁中国立即释放陈建芳 https://www.nchrd.org/2019/10/china-drop-subversion-charge-release-woman-human-rights-defender-chen-jianfang/


2019.12.5网络政治犯周报(总第18期,2019年11月28日至12月5日)

一、                       新悉网 络 政治 犯 1.        2019.11.29 得悉: 广西北海王某 华因在微信支持香港抗争被行拘 https://twitter.com/SpeechFreedomCN/status/120060...